editor decision started nature rejection

Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. response letterresubmit, 3. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information such as conflicts of interest and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? [CDATA[> The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? How did it go for you after this? Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . Unfortunately, as a freelancer, it comes with the job. [CDATA[// >