editor decision started nature rejection

Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. response letterresubmit, 3. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information such as conflicts of interest and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? [CDATA[> The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? How did it go for you after this? Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . Unfortunately, as a freelancer, it comes with the job. [CDATA[// >Nature (journal) - Wikipedia Deciding when or whether you should write a rebuttal, determining what steps you should take next if you choose the . //-->What does "Editor Decision Started" mean? : r/labrats - reddit Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. - However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. How, when, and why you should appeal an editor's decision - Cell Nature Neuroscience Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Welcome to the Northern Ireland Assembly web site, which was set up to inform interested viewers of the day-to-day business and historical background of devolved Government in Northern Ireland. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. Committee for Health, Social Services and Public Safety Nature has space to publish only 8% or so of the 200 papers submitted each week, hence its selection criteria are rigorous. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. What does editor decision started mean nature? edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. What does Enterococcus faecalis look like. best firewood for allergies; shannon balenciaga jail; river lathkill postcode In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. The first thing to do when you get a rejection is to take a deep breath and consider your options. Cloudflare Ray ID: 7a2b13d3eec43de7 Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Most respectable journals have a definite map designed since submission, first editoroial decision, review time, last editorial decision, Editing and publication. No products in the cart. Need help with your experiments? PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. Stage 2: Editor assigned. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. That's it . Graduated from ENSAT (national agronomic school of Toulouse) in plant sciences in 2018, I pursued a CIFRE doctorate under contract with SunAgri and INRAE in Avignon between 2019 and 2022. The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and Is it possible to create a concave light? It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. A decision of major revisions means you'll need to do some heavier work. Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. good luck!! At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". Their role is to. Research suggests that . Is there a proper earth ground point in this switch box? Punnag Ghaisas - Assistant Editor for Discover Journals - LinkedIn [CDATA[// >