However, this does not mean you should be satisfied with your current self and avoid growth. He holds an MSc in Tourism & Hospitality from the University of Sunderland. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a style of leadership characterized by direct, top-down communication and commands. At times, the original instruction may get lost within complex and multiple channels of communication. Autocratic leadership always encourages one-way communication to eliminate this problem. There are many qualities that are needed to be a good leader or manager. Instead of there being a democratic process for teams, there are no group positions of leadership with the autocratic style. This is one of the autocratic leader strengths and weaknesses that is highly dependent on the workplace environment. Autocratic executives can affect more productive project completion since they spread information swiftly throughout a company. More Cautious If that leader goes away, then the team is unable to function because they were focused on their role. Each person involved in autocratic organizations knows their position and role in achieving the desired target. The advantages and disadvantages below refer to autocracy in general, including the two types of autocracy as discussed above. There may be situations when leaders are less qualified than their subordinates. The democratic leadership style does solicit for opinions, perspectives, and experiences. The leader is the only one who is in charge of the situation. This working environment can leave employees feeling suppressed. Under autocratic leaders, subordinates would fear due to demands and expectations. These types of interactions do not create a sustainable working relationship, which ultimately creates productivity problems as workers experience lower morale levels. Strong sense of control and direction: Autocratic leaders provide clear direction and expectations for their team members, which can create a sense of order and stability. In such organizations, employees are highly experienced and knowledgeable and they tend to work in a democratic environment instead of an autocratic environment. At the end of the day, the autocratic leader is like the captain of a ship: every decision is a weight on their shoulders and they are ultimately responsible for what happens. Disadvantages: Although some managers adopt democratic leadership, it is just to please their subordinates but they do not follow the technique fully. This style has close links with Herzberg's motivators and Maslow's higher order skills and also applies to McGregor's theory Y view of workers. This is because they do not consult any other members of their team, so they dont have to wait for other opinions or work through different perspectives to find an appropriate compromise. Business, sports, politics, and many other fields have witnessed a great number of autocratic leaders throughout the history. The manager will however make the actual decisions (in the best interests of the workers) as they believe the staff still need direction and in this way it is still somewhat of an autocratic approach. Autocratic leaders are typically trusted with decisions or important tasks. Required fields are marked *. Essentially, no one will be confused about the direction of a company or even the specific assignment they are working on. The laissez-faire or free reign leader scarcely provides direction to his team members. Advantages of Autocratic Leadership Quick Decision Making. It is a style which dictates how people are supposed to work. Managers deal with their employees in different ways. 1. Moreover, the instructions will go straight to the employees. It can also mean workers personal needs are neglected, causing them to feel like their supervisor does not care about them as individuals. So, there are advantages of the autocratic leadership style for the employees, too. Benefits of autocratic leadership Here are some of the pros of an autocratic leadership approach. Your email address will not be published. - encourages independence and creativity. They may also feel that the leadership does not care about their needs and desires which is unproductive for organisations. 5. Moreover, they also like to enjoy the credit for the projects success, leaving the employees disheartened. All rights reserved LCHW. It improves productivity. There is just one person in charge. Create a leadership learning plan. The autocratic leadership style is highly dependent upon the leader. However, according to Schaeffer (2002) autocratic leaders are not those who bully people needlessly. If you know anything about democratic leadership, you will know that it sounds better than autocracy. These environments allow for an error margin of zero. Safeguarding Mental Health in the Gig Economy Strengths of Laissez-Faire Leaders An autocratic. But that is not the case always, there are many instances when autocratic leadership has proved itself a desirable option in the organizational setting. Autocratic leaders tend to do well in these settings because they ensure that projects are finished on time and that workers follow safety rules to prevent accidents and injuries. The leader does not have to deal with internal politics or disputes at the decision-making stage. According to St Thomas University (2018) the autocratic leadership process generally entails one person making all the strategic decisions for their subordinates. Advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership pdf It would be a great world if everyone could work together cohesively, pushing a business to its desired goal. This leadership style doesnt have a specific training forum to attend or require knowledge of a specific theory of leadership. The correct leadership approach used at the right time will foster a long-term employeeleader relationship. They wont get blamed if it fails and they wont get credit if it succeeds. For that reason, some entities using this structure create an inheritance chain which allows another person to step into the leadership role right away. They are bound to follow whatever the leaders ask them. Faster decision-making is the key to attaining organizational goals. It also creates hardships for the leader because they may get blamed for the actions of a worker when that worker was told to do something completely different. One of the benefits of autocratic leadership is that it can help an inexperienced team achieve goals that they wouldn't be able to do alone. It will also highlight team members that have strong creative skills and those that do not. As in an autocratic organization, a single leader is involved in decision-making, he makes decisions based on his own logic and judgment. The first and foremost advantage of this type of leadership style is that it helps the company in making a quick decision as the decision is centralized with the leader. Advantages Quick decision making: This comes in handy when a leader is governing a small group or business. To conclude, though autocratic leadership style has several disadvantages, it can be argued that there are some situations autocratic leadership style should yield better results for organisations. Professionals operating under this leadership can have lower confidence and slower decision-making skills. Some are collaborative and inspiring, while some are authoritative and controlling. Unlike, group decision-making the autocratic leader does not have to decide with his followers. This improves the speed of decisions because only one person is weighing the pros and cons of each choice, not a C-Suite. The main characteristics of autocratic leadership style are as follows: * Autocratic leaders make all the decisions and pass them down to the people under them for implementation. This form serves well when the . Autocratic leadership is . This creates more speed, better productivity, and enhanced efficiencies within the workplace. Low satisfaction also results in below performance than expectations. Advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership style. Advantages of Bureaucratic Leadership Bureaucratic leadership works in so many ways0 Job security and results are both stable Favoritism is no longer a factor in the equation Roles, duties, and expectations are all evident A system of processes and rules that are extremely apparent creates a stronger level of job security That means a decision is made on the timetable of the leader and no one else. However, they describe the disadvantages of this style as promoting staff defiance, lack of free . This may make many employees feeling intellectually stifled. Autocratic leadership is defined by a top-down approach when it comes to all decision-making, procedures, and policies within an organization. It may create an unwelcome culture within the organization. The free reign approach can prove an effective type of leadership when the team has achieved identity and cohesion, resulting in motivated and resourceful team members. In addition, normally, inexperienced employees are rules followers. These types of leaders are known as democratic leaders and laissez-faire leaders, respectively. Autocratic leadership eradicates this confusion as the command goes straight to the people involved. Autocratic leadership is an exchange process, so it is a matter of contingent reinforcement of staff based on performances. On the other hand, employees are responsible for following instructions and meeting deadlines. Do you have a team of inexperienced employees? 7. When an autocratic leadership style is used in these situations, then the control the policies and procedures provide encourage a deeper commitment to safety. As such, between them, there is no communication and you know communication is a must for a healthy relationship. It encourages a higher churn rate. Over time, this makes employee morale begin to sink. They will delegate to them the authority to do this (empowerment) and listen to their advice. Autocratic Leadership (Authoritarian): A leadership style in which an individual is in control of all the decisions and tasks and his/her "followers" have little to no say in the final decision. Many prime ministers and presidents around the world are also well-known for their autocratic style. - They don't have group members, they have followers. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Boston House, Because of poor coordination, low job satisfaction, low motivation, etc. . Only the leader will weigh the pros and cons of every option instead of the entire C-suite. This is yet another of the several advantages of autocratic leadership style. That means workers tend to not take ownership of the work they do because there is no incentive to do so. However, excess control can also result in low employee morale and employee engagement. The advantages of Autocratic Leadership are: 1. This leadership style can produce authoritative short-term results. Some are collaborative and inspiring, while some are authoritative and controlling. One of the other notable cons of the autocratic leadership style is that there is a poor relationship between the leader and followers. When the leader is the only person in the organization who makes decisions and determines the companys strategy, they can easily feel overwhelmed. There are fewer delays because best practices are being followed consistently. Autocratic leaders take the pressure off of their teams because they are fully responsible for the decisions that are made. But, this lacks in autocratic organizations. Experienced, skilled workers tend to do better in an environment where their leader asks for their input in decision-making or even leaves decision-making entirely up to them. It improves overall communication. It creates a lack of feedback. Khan et al. For employees, an environment where decision-making is solely the managers job can mean a relatively low stress environment. An autocratic leader is well-equipped to deal with a crisis situation. Most of the time Mr. Worth was absent from the rest of the employees, he communicated through his assistant. Pros Employees do not get recognition for their efforts. Autocratic leaders have imperious or commanding personalities. Attner, R. and Plunkett, W. (1994) Introduction to management, 5th edition, California: Wadsworth, Inc. Murphy, M. (2019) Does anyone actually like autocratic leaders? Downsides of Autocratic Leadership While autocratic leadership can be beneficial at times, there are also many instances where this leadership style can be problematic. It is a negative cycle which only increases when the leader makes a poor decision that could have been avoided if a team consultation occurred. employees also do not show their commitment to the organizational purpose. Such times require a leader with the ability to give instructions or guide and direct to those under his or her authority. In autocratic organizations, there are clearly defined tasks, roles, rules, and deadlines to follow. Likewise, Leona Helmsley of the Helmsley hotel chain andMartha Stewart of MSLO are also considered to have exercised this type of leadership style. However, this leadership style become less effective in large organizations. These. That means the personal morality of the leader becomes the corporate reality of the business. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Autocratic Leadership, Poor Relationship Between the leader and Followers, Not Suitable for Large and Diversified Organizations, What is Organizational Change? In, laissez-faire leadership leader gives all power to his subordinates to act on their own. It is one of the biggest, advantages of the autocratic leadership style, Faster decision-making and quick information-sharing can help boost the teams productivity. According to Startingbusiness.com, a significant drawback to working with an autocratic leader is the lack of flexibility in the workplace. As such, in autocratic leadership, faster decisions can be made. These benefits of autocratic leadership can swiftly take the team out of trouble. Fewer layers of administration and lesser feedback to look into facilitates swift decision-making in the team. If that leader does not create a fair working environment, then it is difficult for any employees to change that environment. Advantages of Autocratic Leadership . 6. Advantages of autocratic leadership style Many leaders use autocratic leadership style to establish centralised control in exercising the decision-making authority and use that control to accomplish the desired results. Team members have creative freedom 3. The autocratic leadership style means that the person in charge has the entire control upon all decision making. Because of the vertical or one-way communication channel subordinates do not get the opportunity to share their ideas and thoughts. Autocratic leadership refers to a form of leadership in which a leader takes choices without consulting others. That consistency leads toward corporate success. 1. Subordinates are expected to comply with orders from their supervisors, who in turn are expected to comply with orders from their superiors. For many it is someone who can inspire and get the most from their staff. SWOT Analysis of Kelloggs (Kellogg Company), https://www.forbes.com/sites/markmurphy/2019/11/24/does-anyone-actually-like-autocratic-leaders-new-data-says-yes/?sh=bd0ef4e10de5, https://hbr.org/2002/10/the-leadership-journey. The cadets were fresh and were eager to learn, my Commanding Officer told me to do the "traditional" way of welcoming the cadets, this in fact is very beneficial to me and us because it instill dis. As such, here, every employee is abiding by strict discipline. Autocratic leaders make choices or decisions based on their own beliefs and do not involve others for their suggestion or advice. It motivates staff by appealing to their personal desires and on instrumental economic transactions. The leader shares defined roles and patterns of work with the employees. the us american football coach vince lombardi is an example.
Fireboy And Watergirl 5 Unblocked,
Police Activity Sacramento Now,
Give At Least 10 Problems Of Not Wearing Swimwear,
Catahoula Breeder Oklahoma,
What Does Ashlee Mean In Greek,
Articles A